Sample Assessment Reports
Preview the depth and structure of ImplicitifyAI assessment reports before you begin. Each sample shows the full report format for a representative scoring profile.
Measure anything.
Browse the gallery freely — create a free account to open full sample reports. Individuals may pick two complete samples to read end-to-end.
Attachment & Personality Integration
Secure Attachment
Low anxiety and low avoidance — anxiety and avoidance dimension scores with Secure quadrant placement.
ECR-SFAnxious-Preoccupied Attachment
High anxiety and low avoidance — anxiety and avoidance dimension scores with Anxious-Preoccupied quadrant placement.
ECR-SFDismissive-Avoidant Attachment
Low anxiety and high avoidance — anxiety and avoidance dimension scores with Dismissive-Avoidant quadrant placement.
ECR-SFFearful-Avoidant Attachment
High anxiety and high avoidance — anxiety and avoidance dimension scores with Fearful-Avoidant quadrant placement.
ECR-SFDomain-Specific Reports
Big Five Personality
Standing on Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism with normative percentiles and facet-level breakdown.
IPIP-50Comprehensive Personality (IPIP-NEO-120)
All five Big Five domains plus 30 facets — each with a population percentile and 90% confidence range against a 320,000-person reference sample.
IPIP-NEO-120HEXACO Personality (IPIP-HEXACO)
Six domains and 24 facets — Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness — each with a population percentile and 90% confidence range from the Ashton et al. (2007) reference sample.
IPIP-HEXACOVIA Character Strengths (IPIP-VIA-R)
All 24 character strengths grouped under the six VIA core virtues — Wisdom, Courage, Humanity, Justice, Temperance, and Transcendence — each scored by the live engine.
IPIP-VIA-RVisual Digit Span Report
Individual working-memory report: maximum span and sequences correct for the variant run. Raw span, not norm-referenced.
Visual Digit SpanLexical Decision Task — Associative Priming
Block 1 of the priming task: forward and backward associative priming as within-subject reaction-time differences in milliseconds, with the published Semantic Priming Project magnitude as a standardized reference. No percentile, no T-score.
Lexical Decision TaskLexical Decision Task — Prime Interval (SOA)
Block 2 of the priming task: short (200 ms) versus long (1200 ms) prime-interval priming and their contrast, in milliseconds, each with a 95% margin from the respondent’s own trials and its percentile within the Semantic Priming Project per-subject sample. Full research-length administration: 640 scored trials, about 45 minutes. No T-score or IQ-style composite.
Lexical Decision TaskImplicit Motives (PSE)
Achievement, affiliation, and power motive imagery scores with normative comparisons and narrative interpretation.
PSECore Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT)
Recurring wishes, perceived responses from others, and responses of self — scored by the lexical CCRT engine from free-text relationship narratives.
CCRTExperiences in Close Relationships – Short Form (ECR-SF)
Anxiety and avoidance dimension scores with quadrant placement — engine-scored from the verbatim 12-item ECR-SF (Wei et al., 2007).
ECR-SFInterpersonal Style (IPC-32)
Circumplex profile with angular position, extremity index, and octant-level narrative interpretation.
IPC-32Schizoid-Avoidant Distinction (SADT)
Differential profile contrasting interpersonal style and defensive organisation to illustrate the detached-vs-avoidant distinction.
IPC-32 + DMQ-30Integrative Report (IPPS)
Multi-domain synthesis across trait, interpersonal, and defensive profiles with convergence and divergence analysis.
IPIP + IPC-32 + DMQ-30Mini-IPIP Report
Short-form Big Five report using the 20-item Mini-IPIP with domain scores and brief narrative.
Mini-IPIPIPIP-NEO-60 Report
Full Big Five profile across all five domains (N/E/O/A/C) plus the thirty facets beneath them — every score computed by the live engine.
IPIP-NEO-60Cognitive Restructuring Worksheet
Sample completed CBT thought-record worksheet showing distortion identification, evidence examination, and balanced alternative thought construction.
WorksheetAtkinson–Shiffrin Memory Battery
Three-paradigm memory report: paired-associate encoding accuracy with a lag-decay slope, brief serial-display partial-report accuracy, and free-recall total with within-subject primacy and recency effects. No population norm.
Memory BatteryAge-of-Acquisition Lexical Decision Task
Mean reaction times for early-acquired and late-acquired words, the AoA effect (late minus early RT in milliseconds), and per-cell accuracy. No percentile, no T-score.
AoA Lexical DecisionELP Lexical Decision Task
Mean reaction times across five word-frequency bands, the word-frequency effect (very-low minus very-high RT in milliseconds), lexicality contrast, signal-detection sensitivity (d′), and per-condition accuracy. No percentile, no T-score.
ELP Lexical DecisionVariable Tempo Stroop (Experimental)
Per-block congruent RT, incongruent RT, Stroop interference, and accuracy across four tempo blocks, plus Tempo Amplification Ratio, Dynamic Inhibition, and Executive Flexibility indices. No population norm.
Variable Tempo StroopStroop Color–Word Test
Colour-naming (neutral), word-reading (congruent), and incongruent block reaction times, overall accuracy, and the within-person Stroop interference effect (incongruent − congruent RT, in ms). No population norm.
StroopAtkinson–Shiffrin Paired Associates
Per-lag recall accuracy across lags 1/2/4/8/16 from a 25-probe continuous paired-associate run, plotted against the Atkinson–Shiffrin (1968) theoretical lag curve, with overall accuracy, mean deviation from theory, and the lag-decay effect. Theory-referenced — no population norm.
Paired-associate memoryWord-Recognition Validity Test
A two-alternative forced-choice recognition run: recognition accuracy, an exact one-tailed below-chance binomial test, a provisional 45/50 forced-choice cutoff, and an overall VALID / QUESTIONABLE / INVALID performance-validity classification. No population norm.
Performance validityVisual Spatialization Ability Test (Mental Rotation)
Cube-rotation performance from the deterministic 30-trial bank: raw score out of 60, per-block accuracy across three difficulty blocks, median response time, and a per-trial breakdown of cued rotation versus chosen orientation. Raw score only — no population norm.
Mental rotationEmotional Stroop Test
Mean colour-naming reaction time and accuracy for emotion versus matched neutral words, overall accuracy, the within-person emotional-interference effect (emotion − neutral RT, in ms), and the accuracy cost. No population norm.
Emotional StroopSocial, Interpersonal & Clinical Screening
Rejection Sensitivity (RSQ)
Per-context rejection-sensitivity scores across romantic, friendship, academic, and family domains — scored by the live engine.
RSQEmpathy (TEQ-16)
Overall empathy score with narrative interpretation from the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire.
TEQ-16Need to Belong Scale
Strength of the fundamental drive for social connection and belonging, with narrative band.
N2BMarlowe–Crowne SDS-13
Social-desirability total (0–13) from Reynolds’s (1982) Form C short form — the tendency to answer in an overly favorable, socially approved direction. Raw total and per-item mean; no population norm.
MC-SDS-13Machiavellianism (IPIP)
Moderately elevated profile on the 10-item public-domain IPIP representation of the MACH-IV (Christie & Geis, 1970) — raw score, per-item mean, and narrative band scored by the live engine.
IPIP MachiavellianismNarcissism (IPIP)
Mid-range profile on the 10-item public-domain IPIP narcissism scale — raw score, per-item mean, and narrative band scored by the live engine.
IPIP NarcissismPsychopathy (IPIP)
Low-range profile on the 10-item public-domain IPIP psychopathy scale — raw score, per-item mean, and narrative band scored by the live engine.
IPIP PsychopathyRevised Social Anhedonia Scale (R-SAS)
40-item true/false social-anhedonia scale from the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales, scored against published sex-referenced norms. The sample models a female respondent at or above the published screening cut-off, showing the elevated-range note a clinician-assigned administration produces.
R-SASRevised Social Anhedonia Scale (R-SAS) — Male-Referenced
The same 40-item true/false social-anhedonia scale, this time modelling a male respondent at or above the published male screening cut-off (20) — showing how the male-referenced normative statistics, percentile, and elevated-range note render for a clinician assessing a male patient.
R-SAS (male norms)Magical Ideation Scale (MIS)
30-item true/false Wisconsin Schizotypy scale of magical belief, scored against published sex-referenced norms. The sample models a female respondent at or above the published screening cut-off (21), showing the elevated-range note a clinician-assigned administration produces.
MISPerceptual Aberration Scale (PAS)
35-item true/false Wisconsin Schizotypy scale of body-image and perceptual distortion, scored against published sex-referenced norms. The sample models a female respondent at or above the published screening cut-off (19), showing the elevated-range note.
PASRevised Physical Anhedonia Scale (RPAS)
61-item true/false Wisconsin Schizotypy scale of diminished sensory and physical pleasure, scored against published sex-referenced norms. The sample models a female respondent at or above the published screening cut-off (20), showing the elevated-range note.
RPASImpulsive-Nonconformity Scale (INS)
51-item true/false Wisconsin Schizotypy scale of impulsive, norm-defying behavior, scored against published sex-referenced norms. The sample models a female respondent at or above the published screening cut-off (27), showing the elevated-range note.
INSHypomanic Personality Scale (HPS)
48-item true/false scale of hypomanic personality traits from the Wisconsin battery, scored against published sex-referenced norms. The sample models a female respondent at or above the published screening cut-off (38), showing the elevated-range note.
HPSInfrequency Scale (Validity)
13-item true/false validity index that accompanies the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales. The sample models a respondent endorsing four improbable items — above the published more-than-two rule — showing the protocol-validity concern band a clinician reviews. A response-quality flag, not a schizotypy dimension.
Infrequency